• Hi Guest - Come check out all of the new CP Merch Shop! Now you can support CigarPass buy purchasing hats, apparel, and more...
    Click here to visit! here...

Padron 1926 80th Anniversary

Kingantz

Growing too fast.
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
7,648
Wrapper: Nicaraguan sun grown maduro
Binder: Nicaraguan
Filler: Nicaraguan

Over the past several weeks, I have been the very lucky recipient of a few Padron 80th Annis (thank you again to all). I was asked to do a review of one of these by one of the very generous brothers, of which I decided to do today.

This cigar is a beautiful sight to behold with a dark chocolate wrapper and lots of oil glistening. It’s very light in the hand with a slight give when squeezing the box pressed body.

05-11-08Imported043.jpg


I clipped the head and pre-light draw was unfortunately very loose. It had that delicious dark coffee liqueur flavor, a little Bailey’s Irish Cream mixed in. After lighting the foot, first draw was a powerhouse of smoke, a lot to do with the overly loose draw, however still full-bodied with a ton of spice at first and that most delicious Padronish rich dark cocoa flavor.

05-11-08Imported058.jpg


05-11-08Imported062.jpg


After a few draws and getting a quarter way in, the spiciness subsided to a decent level and gave way to a very smooth smoke, chock full of heavy earth and wood. This was a very thick, almost chewy smoke. Loads of leather and chocolate came to the front with tastes of vanilla on a long finish. Delicious dark roasted nuts with small hints of licorice and nutmeg were mingling together in there as well. Tons of smoke poured from this thing (from both ends).

05-11-08Imported064.jpg


05-11-08Imported067.jpg


05-11-08Imported069.jpg


05-11-08Imported071.jpg


Due to the very loose draw, I had to take small puffs, or I was liable to fry my brains from the strength of the smoke. This was definitely full bodied throughout. The ash held on for quite some time (definitely had fun getting the three bands off without losing it), and it finally dropped with about an inch or so to go.

05-11-08Imported074.jpg


05-11-08Imported078.jpg


I have to say this was one awesome smoke, and would have been even more so if the draw hadn’t been so loose. I was going to pull out the ‘ol Swiss Army and really finish this thing off, however the nub came completely unraveled, so I just laid it down. Thanks again for the opportunity and pleasure of smoking my first 80th!!

05-11-08Imported079.jpg
 
Nice review :thumbs: I can't wait to put flame to the one resting in the humi.

Brian
 
I agree, I have only had 1 but it was fantastic! Can't wait to smoke my other.
 
Another great review Greg! I have a few of these I've been sitting on, but have yet to try one. Gonna have to change that soon.
 
I have smoked one of these, It was good enough that I went out and bought a box shortly after. :D

It really is an excellent cigar. Your review of it was wonderful. :thumbs:
 
This is a powerful, intense cigar. To be honest, the first one I had really scrambled me. Gonna have to try this again soon and take it a little more slowly. Definitely not to be smoked like a 1964 or even a 1926.

Thank you for the fine review!

Wilkey
 
Great review. These 80ths sure are beautiful cigars. Lookin' forward to buying a few when I win the lotto... :whistling:

mac
 
Great review! I have a couple 40th maduros I'm sitting on, this makes me want to pop one out right now!

I know it's a whole different smoke, but I've found that the 64's I've smoked also were very light in the hand and very loose draws. I don't know, maybe it's just the style of these Padron Anni's. If you're not careful all that smoke will sneak up on ya!
 
This is now my second favorite Padron behind the PAM Exclusivos. I wish they were a little less expensive (yeah, I'm a frugal bastage) so I could smoke more of them.

If you're curious:

1. PAM Exclusivos
2. 80th Maduro
3. 40th Maduro
4. 2k maduro (a regular in my rotation)
5. 3k natural

I reserve the right to change this order once I happen to get my hands on a Millenium.
 
Nice reveiw mate.
I am waiting for that special day to spark one of mine up...... :whistling:

Maybe Friday
 
This is a powerful, intense cigar. To be honest, the first one I had really scrambled me. Gonna have to try this again soon and take it a little more slowly. Definitely not to be smoked like a 1964 or even a 1926.

Thank you for the fine review!

Wilkey

It's pretty damn close to the 1926 blend...
 
This is a powerful, intense cigar. To be honest, the first one I had really scrambled me. Gonna have to try this again soon and take it a little more slowly. Definitely not to be smoked like a 1964 or even a 1926.

Thank you for the fine review!

Wilkey
It's pretty damn close to the 1926 blend...
Really!

Just goes to show how settings can affect our impressions. I'm afraid I just didn't take my time as I would have liked with this first one. It merits a more leisurely pace. Perhaps I'm turning in my perception of Padron. This weekend I smoked a 1964 and a 2000 maddie and they both came across as much stronger than I usually perceive them. Palate fluctuations might occur on several overlapping time frames. From cigar to cigar and in longer cycles over time.

Wilkey
 
Excellent review with great pics.

I have to agree with Alan. The PAM Exclusivo is still one of my favorite Padron's.

The 80th, as with the 40th, is another variation of the 1926 blend and while they are good cigars, IMO, their price point do not make them better than the PAM blend by any means.

Brian
 
The PAM Exclusivo is still one of my favorite Padron's.
Now that's a cigar that's close to my heart. Although I'm not sure I could smoke them like George Burns smoked his beloved El Producto Queens. ;)

Wilkey
 
Perhaps I'm in the minority here, but I was a little dissapointed with the 80th. I've only had one, and don't get me wrong, it was a great cigar. It was a sight to behold. To me, the experience was similar to that of smoking a #1 Maddie.I love the entire 1926 series, but I was expecting so much more (from the hype, the beautiful appearance, and the price). Anyways, thanks so much for the wonderful review. Makes me want to spark one up!
 
For me, a $30 cigar is so expensive that smoked in a modest, casual context (e.g., on the porch, reading) as opposed to a celebratory context, it's very difficult for it to meet the expectations that come with such a price tag. Well, unless it's a truly sublime experience...which the 80[sup]th[/sup] does not appear to provide at this time.

Wilkey
 
For me, a $30 cigar is so expensive that smoked in a modest, casual context (e.g., on the porch, reading) as opposed to a celebratory context, it's very difficult for it to meet the expectations that come with such a price tag. Well, unless it's a truly sublime experience...which the 80[sup]th[/sup] does not appear to provide at this time.
Wilkey


Well said, I have yet to have a $30 current production cigar that has met this expectation :(
 
For me, a $30 cigar is so expensive that smoked in a modest, casual context (e.g., on the porch, reading) as opposed to a celebratory context, it's very difficult for it to meet the expectations that come with such a price tag. Well, unless it's a truly sublime experience...which the 80[sup]th[/sup] does not appear to provide at this time.
Wilkey
Well said, I have yet to have a $30 current production cigar that has met this expectation :(
Well, there's always the Stradivarius. I've never smoked a cigar that's been "cloistered" before...maybe that's the secret to to tobaccular orgasm?

Wilkey
 
For me, a $30 cigar is so expensive that smoked in a modest, casual context (e.g., on the porch, reading) as opposed to a celebratory context, it's very difficult for it to meet the expectations that come with such a price tag. Well, unless it's a truly sublime experience...which the 80[sup]th[/sup] does not appear to provide at this time.
Wilkey
Well said, I have yet to have a $30 current production cigar that has met this expectation :(
Well, there's always the Stradivarius. I've never smoked a cigar that's been "cloistered" before...maybe that's the secret to to tobaccular orgasm?

Wilkey

I've only seen one smoked of these but I didn't see any orgasmic activity related to it :laugh:
 
Great review, Greg. This has become one of my favorite "special occasion" smokes.

For me, a $30 cigar is so expensive that smoked in a modest, casual context (e.g., on the porch, reading) as opposed to a celebratory context, it's very difficult for it to meet the expectations that come with such a price tag. Well, unless it's a truly sublime experience...which the 80[sup]th[/sup] does not appear to provide at this time.
Wilkey

Well said, I have yet to have a $30 current production cigar that has met this expectation :(
Hmm....an interesting and often repeated discussion. What makes a bottle of scotch or wine worth $150.00...?? Is it really four times better than a $40.00 bottle..?? In some cases, in some settings, the answer is "absolutely". I guess I feel that way about the 80th.

I've smoked and shared a few of these, in both regular and maduro. No, this is not the smoke to have when you are washing the car, or with coffee in the AM (unless you have balls of iron... :laugh:). But, with a friend, after a fine meal, in the right setting, perhaps with a bit of single malt or a fine port, the 80th has yet to disappoint. I have to say for me, the jury is still out on the regular vs. maduro wrappers. The allure of the Padron premium smokes in maduro is easy to understand, but I think the regular wrappers too often get overlooked as "too plain". That's too bad; in the case of the 80th, the natural wrappers present a bouquet of complex, straight forward, awesomely blended and perfectly fermented tobacco tastes that are something spectacular, to my taste buds. I've also got a box of '26 #2's in regular wrappers, and to me, there is a subtle but clear difference in flavor. Sounds like a good "head to head" review..... :cool:

Cheers, gents - B.B.S.
 
Top