Jump to content


Photo

Padilla Studio Tobac Special Edition Figurado


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 MaytagMan

MaytagMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 141 posts
  • Joined: 22-January 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Salida, CA

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:38 PM

Cigar Snapshot Episode 23

Padilla Studio Tobac Special Edition Figurado

Size: 6 x 60 (Figurado)
Wrapper: Ecuador Habano
Binder: Nicaragua
Filler: Nicaragua

About:
This cigar was created as a result of a collaboration between Ernesto Padilla and the Oliva Cigar Company. This joint limited-production cigar was blended with input from both Padilla and Studio Tobac, rolled by the Oliva Cigar Company and distributed by Ernesto Padilla. The production run was limited to 1,000 boxes of 10, and they retail for $14.00 per cigar.

Prelight:
The cigar was a beautifully constructed figurado, obviously crafted by a skilled torcedor. The wrapper was a medium-dark brown, and was quite toothy - to the point that I detected a noticeable texture as I handled the cigar. There was a visible oily sheen to the wrapper, and the cigar did not have any major defects or veins.

AROMA: There was a distinct barnyard component that dominated the prelight aroma, that was backup with some pleasant straight-tobacco notes. The aroma at the foot is that same, just a bit more concentrated.

TASTE: There was a bitter front end to the prelight taste, along with a fennel/licorice like hint that was present in the finish.

1/3:
The nipple at the foot of the cigar lit easily, and I was immediately hit with a robust pepper-like spice. This spice was in the mouthfeel, but did not linger on my palate or in the finish. There was also a peculiar astringent-like quality at the top of my palate and in the retrohale. The finish was short and dry, and dominated by a green nuttiness.

The draw was a touch problematic at this point. It felt as though I was not getting draw through the whole diameter of the cut at the head, but rather through a much smaller point. There was still sufficient air movement to keep the cigar going, though I had to work at it a bit to get any kind of smoke production.

About halfway through the first third, a tunnel started, which I had expected to see based upon my experience with the cigar up to that point. I decided to try and salvage the cigar the best that I could so that I could continue to smoke it.

2/3:
A definite sweetness emerged on the wrapper, and was a nice counterpoint to the full body of the cigar that was continuing to develop. The smoke production improved a little but, the tunnel remained and actually started to worsen.

The finish of the cigar started to exhibit sweetness, along with notes of dry hay. The strength and flavor of the ligero tobacco began to emerge, and gave the flavor profile a slight bitter edge.

It was hard to evaluate the ash because the tunnel cased an uneven burn, and when I ashed the cigar there was a very solid chunk that remained on the cigar, which is a typical occurrence when a cigar is tunneling.

3/3:
The flavors continued to intensify as the cigar moved into the final third, as did both the overall body and strength. The peppery spice became a little bit deeper and enveloped my entire palate as the final third progressed. The tunnel and resulting burn issue seemed to finally be corrected by the middle of the final third. I smoked the cigar down to about the last inch before putting it down.

Overall:
Overall, I think that kudos should go to Ernesto Padilla for his participation with the blend on this cigar. Though I think that the cigar could have used some more time to sit so that the flavors could marry and mature a bit, I specifically thought that the combination of strength and sweetness was nice.

Unfortunately, I cannot say the same thing about the Oliva Cigar Company's contribution to the cigar. In the case of the cigar that I sampled, I certainly was wrong in judging a book by its cover. Though the cigar appeared to be well-constructed, the unfortunate construction error prevented me from being able to enjoy this cigar to the fullest extent. I can't help but think that if this cigar was decently-constructed, that the flavors I experienced would have been better-balanced and the cigar would have been much more enjoyable.

Now I know that you are probably thinking that I should give this cigar another chance. Well, I must admit that my opinion on the issue has been influenced by construction issues I have had with other Oliva products - most recently a box of 2011 V Maduros that were essentially tent pegs. So here is my quandary... if I am only based this decision on the Padilla blending, I probably would. However, since I paid $13.60 for this sample, I don't think that I can justify spending another $13.60 on what in my mind is a game of construction Russian Roulette.


.

Edited by MaytagMan, 12 March 2012 - 12:54 AM.


#2 Wurm

Wurm

    Bratwurst and Beer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,113 posts
  • Joined: 06-October 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 16 February 2012 - 02:14 AM

I've never had a construction problem with any Oliva product I've smoked. And I purchase boxes of the 'O' and 'G' cigars every year.

#3 famouscigars

famouscigars

    CP Newbie

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Joined: 01-February 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:stuart, florida

Posted 19 February 2012 - 05:48 PM

i really think u should splash out on another $13.60. personally i loved the padilla, the tunnel issue i never came across and i have had the pleasure of having a few of them.. i would recommend u give Padilla another chance.. padilla robusto is the way forward.

#4 Rod

Rod

    Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,406 posts
  • Joined: 05-January 01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upland, CA

Posted 19 February 2012 - 10:08 PM

This jackass has been banned due to spamming.

#5 Yojimbo

Yojimbo

    Brutish Nubber

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 927 posts
  • Joined: 23-January 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Myrtle Beach, SC

Posted 19 February 2012 - 10:26 PM

Very informative review, thanks for posting. I've smoked maybe 2 Padillas in my life, but will be cautious moving forward.

#6 MaytagMan

MaytagMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 141 posts
  • Joined: 22-January 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Salida, CA

Posted 25 February 2012 - 05:34 PM

Thanks guys... I am a Padilla fan, especially the 1932. The main problem for me was the construction - that plus the fact that I have had bad luck with Oliva contruction more than a few times kind of soured me I guess...

#7 MadMonk

MadMonk

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,015 posts
  • Joined: 21-February 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South

Posted 25 February 2012 - 08:30 PM

I think Ernesto has a phenomenal Palate. Best in the business for my tastes.
I have always said to find a blender or reviewer whose sensibilities seem on par with your own.
With Ernesto, I find that his offerings are always tasty and complex. Just the way I like them.

#8 MaytagMan

MaytagMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 141 posts
  • Joined: 22-January 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Salida, CA

Posted 04 March 2012 - 02:58 AM

With Ernesto, I find that his offerings are always tasty and complex. Just the way I like them.


Agreed.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users