Stick with what works is what I say...I switched glues that I sniff so that may be the culprit.
confused about cigar flavor generator
#21
Posted 07 March 2012 - 03:37 AM
#22
Posted 07 March 2012 - 08:35 AM
www.cigarsinternational.com/blendlab/
Edit: Spelling, add link
Edited by broblues, 07 March 2012 - 09:19 AM.
#23
Posted 07 March 2012 - 08:52 AM
I will however for the sake of this threat, strip off an inch from the foot of each one and report back here.
#24
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:37 AM
Hi you guys,
OK here is the newbie. I am kind of confused about what area of the cigar generates the most flavor. I have read once that "categorically" the Wrapper is where the most flavor comes from. Also I read the "categorically" the wrapper is not the most flavor producer in a cigar. I have assumed that since the wrapper is what? 5% of the cigar it should not be that big on the final flavor. I have also noticed that the wrapper is the only one that is called by name and last name, they only mention the country of origin for the filer and binder. Why the importance of the wrapper above the other two components? Is it the wrapper the most important flavor giver? should I classified cigar on my cigar log by wrapper, or by the entire denomination? Any help about flavor would be really appreciate.
Thank you
Alfredo
You may want to include "age" in your log as aging also has an impact on cigar flavor. Some tobacco's are affected mored than others by aging in my opinion.
#25
Posted 07 March 2012 - 11:46 AM
He's talking about taking in inch of wrapper off the foot of the cigar, shaggy style. Then smoking it and seeing how it changes as you move back into the part of the cigar that still has a wrapper.
That's how I cut my cigars, but it's important to note that you should probably moisten the cap before you do this. Otherwise you could unravel the cigar. I know this first hand.
I assume you don't cut your cigars that way...
You don't know Clint very well, do you?
#26
Posted 07 March 2012 - 12:22 PM
I just ran across this tip:
Take your cigar, and a double guillotine cutter, placing the cigar inside the cutter, with it positioned about an inch up from the foot. Place just enough pressure on the cutter blades to make a shallow cut on the wrapper. Rotate the cutter with the blades at this depth to make sure the cut goes evenly around the circumference. Peel the wrapper off from the foot. You should now have an exposed foot cigar. Light up, and take note of the flavor before you hit the wrapper and after. I think of it like stripping wires for electrical work.
Info lifted from www.cigarmohel.com.
#27
Posted 07 March 2012 - 03:15 PM
#28
Posted 07 March 2012 - 07:31 PM

Like said in the tip Gavin posted I “stripped” the first section of the stick.

After lighting it up I immediately noticed a difference in the flavor profile. To me the stick was very bland with almost no flavor at all. At one point I got a very slight hint of some spice but that was it. The cigar was drying my mouth out extremely. If this was the flavor of any cigar I would have tossed it. It had very little smoke almost non and the burn was all over the place.

Once I hit the wrapper section of the cigar I was actually shocked by the extreme change in the flavor profile. Everything that I love about the Maduro 2000 showed up and reminded me of why I love this smoke so much. The coco flavor and the very smooth creamy smoke. My mouth began to moisten up again and the entire bland flavor was gone. All in all I was completely shocked at how much of the flavor profile was in the wrapper. If you are curious I suggest you give it a try this is just my finding and I am by no means a pro. I am just one tall a$$ newbie in this crazy cigar world!
#29
Posted 08 March 2012 - 01:35 AM
#30
Posted 08 March 2012 - 06:50 AM
BTW......... Just how tall are you Paul?
#31
Posted 08 March 2012 - 07:16 AM
Cool! I may have to give this a go just for kicks.
BTW......... Just how tall are you Paul?
6'8"... And it really sucks!
#32
Posted 08 March 2012 - 07:20 AM
He starts with simple questions, but soon he'll be asking for pictures... be careful.
BTW......... Just how tall are you Paul?
6'8"... And it really sucks!
#33
Posted 08 March 2012 - 07:49 AM
#34
Posted 08 March 2012 - 10:49 AM
#35
Posted 08 March 2012 - 12:45 PM
It makes the cigar look bigger?
Some claim it reduces the incidence of moldy foot, too.
#36
Posted 08 March 2012 - 01:06 PM
here is what they say on their website
"you have the opportunity to determinate the contribution of the different wrappers from the same blend as the greatest masters blenders of La Aurora do every day. In a new special presentation of 5 cigars, so nobody remains without judging.
Wrapper: Ecuadorian, Connecticut, Cameroon, Brazil and Corojo.
Binder: Dominican.
Filler: Nicaragua, Piloto Cubano and Peruvian.
Sizes: Robusto
Presentation: Boxes of 5 units
i actually have these but never smoked them in succession so never really put together the difference
#37
Posted 08 March 2012 - 01:09 PM
quote from the thread:
In short: a Connecticut broadleaf wrapper over a very mild filler blend could dominate a cigar’s flavor, but a Connecticut shade wrapper over a full-bodied filler certainly would not.
I believe this has been discussed on CP as well!
#38
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:53 PM
#39
Posted 11 March 2012 - 03:09 AM
I conducted an experiment a while back on another private forum. I ordered a bundle of 4x4 Lonsdales. I left some as they came (Conn Shade), and had others rewrapped by a cigar company with Maduro, Corojo, and Sumatra. Each tasting group member was sent the four versions and asked to smoke and review the four noting the difference the wrapper made on the same cigar.
I wish I could find the data somewhere... It was amazing that some people would like or dislike a cigar based upon the chage in wrapper alone.
This is always an intersting topic!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











