Thanks for the interest gregor22. That would give us 8. Anyone else have thoughts on his proposed changes?
My thoughts are this, I don't like your changes lol on pretty much all levels. The reason I set the league up this way, is to pretty much mimic a baseball team (to some extent). I hate having so many corner this, corner that, plus the normal designations like 1st, 2nd, ss, 3rd....and the like. I think it just lends to the confusion when drafting or setting lineups.
I do agree with one thing, smaller leagues can be like shooting fish in a barrel. I think I would be ok with adding a SP and a OF though, even though I don't want to. Or maybe just adding a few more bench spots, and taking away DL spots?
The league that billbaker ran last year was fun, but with so many players on a roster, it made it quite hard to do any kind of trading, because someone always had the market cornered on "corner infielders" because they could be played at multiple positions...stuff like that, and thats only two more teams than we are talking about.
I've never run a "free yahoo" league before, so I have no idea what we are in for. As for weekly rosters vs daily, at first I thought I liked daily, because I want to be able to change in players on a daily basis, but it really handstraps the folks that don't have that daily access. One of those being me, since my work blocks yahoo but not cbs. The way I used to run my leagues is you could swap in a player for another on any day, but those players were then locked in those spots for a week. Of course that was when I was paying $100 for cbs commish service, and I had full control of everything. Now they want something like $180....I can't swing that lol...hell I can't swing the $100 on my own anymore.
I'd like to hear what the other possible owners think though on the changes. Noone so far has said they didn't like the structure, but maybe they were being nice to me lol. I'll go with the collective though on any changes. Anybody?