I admitted I was wrong in calling the 1926 an Anniversary (at least I meant to) and then also brought up the fact that thousands of others were making the same mistake. That then sent you into a whirlwind of long posts. By the way, what is your view on the Padron 1926 anyway? If you are ever in Chicago let me know, we can smoke one together, on me. Should be interesting conversation!
Your posting status is very impressive. I obviously just started and am not used to the caustic nature of the forum. I am catching on quickly however and really like reading everyones views on cigars.
And, thanks for asking, business is never good enough. That is why I love to make deals.
Now please forgive me for being a smart ass but I'm going to call into question your reading comprehension skills. You asked me:
Go back and read my FIRST post in the thread and tell me if you saw this:
By the way, what is your view on the Padron 1926 anyway?
Or did you NOT see that since you couldn't get past your rage towards me when I merely pointed out the fact that you called the cigar by the wrong name?
I prefer the Padron 1926 line over the 64s but there are many a Padron whore out there who see it the other way around (like RicMac25 ).
Now call that "caustic" or whatever you want but when ya post dumb things, chances are yer gonna get yer balz busted. and 99% of the time it's not as "caustic" as you have concluded that it is. So you better grow a thicker layer of skin over that extremely thin one that ya got?
Oh and on a side note when you grossly exaggerate like this:
It removes almost all credibility from any argument thay you may be trying to make. unless of course a "whirlwind" in your book is two or three.
That then sent you into a whirlwind of long posts.
Edited by coventrycat86, 03 August 2005 - 01:46 PM.