• Hi Guest - Come check out all of the new CP Merch Shop! Now you can support CigarPass buy purchasing hats, apparel, and more...
    Click here to visit! here...

Responsibility of the FOG's.

coventrycat86 said:
I am concerned with your obsession with the male penis. Don't you think it's time for you to seek counseling? ???
Click to expand...

It's sex that I have an obsession with, not a certain body part. And yes, I have sought counseling and am currently boning my shrink.
doctor20sex-vi.jpg
 
coventrycat86 said:
celt, when I try and add a new post with a different idea, the system will not let me do it, it adds to the original post. Kinda too bad if you find this inconvenient but that's just the way the board works.
Click to expand...

Hmm, that IS interesting.

When you type a post, at say 9:26 AM:
(coventrycat86 Today, 09:26 AM)

and then 2 other people post after you:

SamClemmons Today, 09:46 AM
Matt R Today, 09:50 AM

You can hit ADD REPLY instead of EDIT 24 minutes later and I think the system will let you add another idea.



coventrycat86 said:
At this point, you're showing your colors, I'm trying to state my points logically and respectfully with you yet you seem to be on some kind of a mission here. I only offered to show you a copy of my resource because you implied that I was not being truthful and you see fit to respond with sarcasm.
Click to expand...

Yes, you've been quite the gentleman. You've inferred that i was "lazy" and "juvenile"

and your use of sarcasm in your response to me in this post:
http://www.cigarpass.com/forums/index.php?...&p=327152"
would lead me to believe that the colors I am showing are quite similar to your own.

coventrycat86 said:
As far as your prefered style of the placement of commas in my previous posts, in my opinion you used far too many and it makes it flow worse than my original post. Again, it's all a matter of personal preference not a matter of being right or wrong.
Click to expand...

Exactly. That is why I said that it flows better for me, the reader. Obviously you prefer to read and write in a 'stream of consciousness' style.

Whatever floats your boat. But know that it's just as annoying as my lack of capitals for some readers.


It is you who cannot "let this go."
Click to expand...

Hm.

My last post yesterday was at 1:45 PM

You then posted at 2:15 PM to another person.
You then posted at 4:03 PM to another person.
You then posted at 8:17 PM to another person.
You then posted at 8:49 PM to another person.
You then posted at 9:25 PM to another person.
You then posted at 9:34 PM to another person.
You then posted at 10:27 PM to another person.
You then posted at 11:31 PM to another person.
You then posted at 11:46 PM to another person.
You then posted at 11:58 PM to another person.
You then posted at 12:19 AM to another person.
You then posted at 12:26 AM to another person.
You then posted at 1:14 AM to another person.

Then, all of the sudden, you need to reply to MY post that I made at 11:20AM FROM THE PREVIOUS DAY, and when I hadn't logged since 5 PM the previous day?!?!?!?!

I came in this morning, and was reading everybody's posts, thinking that it was OVER, when I came to the two posts directed at me.

I respond to these posts, directed AT ME, and I'M the one who won't let it go?!?!?

Wow.





*eidited for the fact that this board does NOT want me to add an URL to my post for some reason. :p
 
This is getting old. Someone be the bigger man, pull their skirt up and STFU!
 
Getting old? It's gotten old...

If you wish to correct each others grammar and spelling, you might want to consider joining this forum: http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/

I believe we're a Cigar Forum...
 
Matt R said:
coventrycat86 said:
The second sentence in incomplete, therefore wrong.
Click to expand...

Did you go to public school? There's(is) no denying that. Look at it again, Bill. The sentence structure is complete.
Click to expand...

No matt, the sentence is an incomplete sentence as with your second one here. Take your second sentence by itself "There's no denying that" which leads one to ask "No denying WHAT?" and if you have to ask that question, the original sentence is incomlete.
 
WOW!!! So if we take out all of the superfluous bullchit, and repeated quotes, we can knock this baby down to what......five, maybe six pages?!?! :whistling:

"Know when to say when!" ;)

Floyd T. :sign:
 
coventrycat86 said:
Matt R said:
coventrycat86 said:
The second sentence in incomplete, therefore wrong.
Click to expand...

Did you go to public school? There's(is) no denying that. Look at it again, Bill. The sentence structure is complete.
Click to expand...

No matt, the sentence is an incomplete sentence as with your second one here. Take your second sentence by itself "There's no denying that" which leads one to ask "No denying WHAT?" and if you have to ask that question, the original sentence is incomlete.
Click to expand...

"That" was defined in the previous sentence, thus, the sentence is complete. Since I am not an English professor, like yourself, I called one to clarify my reasoning. In his opinion, which is kind of a professional one, the sentence is complete. But, you can continue to contradict yourself by pointing out the spelling mistakes of others and then making punctuation errors of your own. Lord knows, we all need something to do with our time.
 
Hey Matthew, you may have the ring and robe, but the question that needs answering is "Who the hell is that dude wearing the tiara under your robe?" :sign:
 
tdog said:
Hey Matthew, you may have the ring and robe, but the question that needs answering is "Who the hell is that dude wearing the tiara under your robe?" :sign:
Click to expand...

That's just wrong and hurtful.

hotgfy.jpg
 
tdog said:
Hey Matthew, you may have the ring and robe, but the question that needs answering is "Who the hell is that dude wearing the tiara under your robe?" :sign:
Click to expand...

This is the only thing hiding under my robe...
mens_1058-vi.jpg
 
ggiese said:
gtphale said:
LOL Love to see who you think wears the robes. :sign:
Click to expand...

I don't THINK anyone wears the robes. It's others that feel THEY should be wearing the robes, and are extremely jealous of those that do. And damn it - when THEY wear those robes and rings, they're going to change things around here... ???

I know you HONESTLY BELIEVE noone wears the robes of the FOG. There is noone worth wearing the robes - it's all a joke, right? ;)

<Sorry, Scot - I had to, but it's an inside joke between me and hale - he knows what I'm saying... :whistling: >


...and I want to know WHO THE HELL woke AlexGTP up. He's never around for these scrimmages unless it's his "peeps" involved... :angry:

Nice going, hale - you got him all riled up BEFORE anything was said bad about you.... :0
Click to expand...

GGIESE,

unlike you I dont like to involve myself in every contraversial thread.
Seems like anytime there is contraversy in a thread ,or a thread gets locked. I can always count on seeing your name in that thread. Sometimes I wish I had 30 to 1 odds in Vegas. :rolleyes: .
 
alexgtp said:
GGIESE,

unlike you I dont like to involve myself in every contraversial thread.
Seems like anytime there is contraversy in a thread ,or a thread gets locked. I can always count on seeing your name in that thread. Sometimes I wish I had 30 to 1 odds in Vegas. :rolleyes: .
Click to expand...

Thats controversial. ;)
 
NullSmurf said:
alexgtp said:
GGIESE,

unlike you I dont like to involve myself in every contraversial thread.
Seems like anytime there is contraversy in a thread ,or a thread gets locked. I can always count on seeing your name in that thread. Sometimes I wish I had 30 to 1 odds in Vegas. :rolleyes: .
Click to expand...

Thats controversial. ;)
Click to expand...

Stop being so marginal Bruce ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top