Corona Gigante
Feminist chicks dig me
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2005
- Messages
- 238
...all credibility on the line now, eh?.... :laugh:OutlawD said:you know "this was the best cigar i ever had"
come to find out it was a __________ (white owl,arrango,)whatever.
[snapback]218128[/snapback]
Pyre said:Haha, I agree whole-heartedly!
I can't help but be somewhat anxious... being a noob, what if my opinion of the cigar is wayyyy off?? I'll be the shame of cigarpass!
LOL, I've already seen a couple reviews that I believe could be the same cigar I smoked. Can't wait to find out all of the identities!
PS. After all of the identities are revealed, it would be *great* if each participant could go back and add the actual cigar name at the top of their review, ala:
Review of Cigar #26
Edit: (AKA Whiteowl Supreme Robusto!!)
[snapback]218206[/snapback]
I said it at the bottom of my reviews - "Do we taste what we expect to taste when you know what you are smoking...?"Lumberg said:So what do you guys think of the results so far?
[snapback]222363[/snapback]
First of all I want to give you a huge thanks from all of us that have been allowed to participate in this, this was a great idea. :thumbs:Lumberg said:So what do you guys think of the results so far?
[snapback]222363[/snapback]
BlindedByScience said:Can't wait to find out what's what....
Lumberg said:BlindedByScience said:Can't wait to find out what's what....
There are I think 11 cigars whose identities have been revealed.
[snapback]222456[/snapback]
junkman_56 said:First of all I want to give you a huge thanks from all of us that have been allowed to participate in this, this was a great idea. :thumbs:Lumberg said:So what do you guys think of the results so far?
[snapback]222363[/snapback]
This experience has allowed me to gain some confidence in writing cigar reviews.
These are only the second and third reviews I have ever done.
Looking at the reviews so far, there seems to be general agreement on the cigars that are the same.
I am looking forward to see the complete list of cigars.
[snapback]222389[/snapback]
These are the first and second reviews, other than my scribbles in my journal, that I've ever written. When trying to assign points, I really scratched my head a bit. I tried to remember the "best" and "worst" smokes I've ever had, and tried my best to use them as a frame of reference. I'll bet this is one of the things that experience only makes a person better at....junkman_56 said:First of all I want to give you a huge thanks from all of us that have been allowed to participate in this, this was a great idea. :thumbs:Lumberg said:So what do you guys think of the results so far?
[snapback]222363[/snapback]
This experience has allowed me to gain some confidence in writing cigar reviews.
These are only the second and third reviews I have ever done.
Looking at the reviews so far, there seems to be general agreement on the cigars that are the same.
I am looking forward to see the complete list of cigars.
[snapback]222389[/snapback]
stevehawk said:From a quick review of the comments made so far, I'm guessing the following numbers are all the same cigar:
49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 58a and 58b
Clues:
- cigar size
- ash color/density
- even/consistent burn
- sweet/citrus taste
- tougher draw
- sloppy cap
Based on these numbers, I'd hazard a guess that all cigars between 49 and 58 are the same. Lumberg, what do ya say?
[snapback]223387[/snapback]
Shibumi said:stevehawk said:From a quick review of the comments made so far, I'm guessing the following numbers are all the same cigar:
49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 58a and 58b
Clues:
- cigar size
- ash color/density
- even/consistent burn
- sweet/citrus taste
- tougher draw
- sloppy cap
Based on these numbers, I'd hazard a guess that all cigars between 49 and 58 are the same. Lumberg, what do ya say?
[snapback]223387[/snapback]
Wow, you have too much time! :laugh:
The funny thing is you're right.
[snapback]223409[/snapback]