43 TRILLION LAWSUIT !?!

[vortex]

That's gotta be a record! Now we can finally explain those $100 hammers.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/49555671

 

[ilikefishes]

Is this not politics?

 

[vortex]

Is this not politics?

While there will be an attempt to spin it that way at first, I guess we shall see what happens.

That's $138,000 for every citizen. Am I a plaintiff?

 

[ironpeddler]

This suit may cost more that 43 trillion in legal fees to prosecute all those involved :whistling:

 

[DeputyDawg]

Gary you said a mouthful. That why most lawsuits are settled out of court due to attorney fees and costs. It's out of control man.

 

[punk_lawyer]

This suit may cost more that 43 trillion in legal fees to prosecute all those involved :whistling:

I need to get in on some of that action!

 

[BigJake6904]

This suit may cost more that 43 trillion in legal fees to prosecute all those involved :whistling:

I need to get in on some of that action!

Punk.







:sign:

 

[vortex]

This suit may cost more that 43 trillion in legal fees to prosecute all those involved :whistling:

I need to get in on some of that action!

Punk.

:laugh:

CNBC took it down but Market Watch is carrying it now. Within hours the original page for the article was taken down after CNBC senior vice president Kevin Krim received news that his children were murdered under suspicious circumstances. No apparant motive for the nanny and slitting one's own throat is rare. She survived it but can't talk at the moment.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/26/us/new-york-nanny-deaths/index.html






:sign:

 

[Setharsis]

Can't find much information on the lawsuit or the law group. Thinking it's just another frivolous lawsuit for publicity. 43 trillion doesn't even seem like the right number in terms of the bailout amount. 2008's bank bailout was only 700 billion.

 

[Not A Nice Person]

The Wall Street Journal is . . . not as respectable as it used to be, before Murdoch bought it. And I note the only source WSJ lists for the story is the "law firm" filing the suit.

I suspect we'll see this one on Snopes pretty soon.

~Boar