Also.... In regards to speed traps...
According to Speedtrap.org,
"
We support more reasonable speed limits, better driver training, improved motorist-to-motorist courtesy, and sensible, easily understood regulations. We oppose heavy-handed enforcement, unfair motorist taxation, speed traps, kangaroo traffic courts, and government edicts that take away your rights as a consumer and user of automobiles.
We're working for the establishment of traffic laws based on engineering principles and public consensus."
At least in Illinois (and I believe it applies equally in all 50 states and possessions) the state law is based upon federal guidelines. That means two things related to establishing speed limits (to get away from "speed traps") must be established in order to succesfully prosecute a speeding charge:
1) A speed limit MUST BE established based upon engineering studies of the area. The speed limit set will be based upon traffic studies, accident analysis, roadway geometry, etc. Gone are the days of just popping up a speed limit sign, "just because".
2) The speed limit signs will be posted according to the Federal guidelines as established in a
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which is further based upon the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. These publications are adopted in their entirety (as I understand) in all 50 states and US possession. That is why all of the signs, roadmarkings, etc in the US look the same. Certainly, in the past there were jurisdictions that would erect a postage stamp size sign lowering the speed to 5 mph so the cops could keep busy. Gone are those days....
If you unfairly receive a speeding ticket because it has been issued at a TRUE "speed trap" (i.e., the local officials decided to drop the speed limit from 65 to 30 just because they wanted to generate revenue), then it can be successfully challenged in court. Before someone beats me with the "kangaroo court" theory - there is an appeal process, which will wind its way from local, to appellate, to state, to US appellate, to US Supreme courts. While the local court may be "kangaroo" by some peoples standards, their are plenty of cases on the books which do not allow local jurisdictions to write "unfair" speeding tickets as a sole source of revenue. That being said, there is an appeal process in place which will overturn the policies and practices of the local jurisdictions who maintain "speed traps". Most courts I know (especially past the local level) take a dim view of the practice. The upper courts can (and do) make sure jurisdictions under their purview are not creating "speed traps" - but it has to be processed through the system in order for it to happen.
Okay - I'm done.... :sign: Whewwwww.... Too much thinking..... That hurts... Time for a cigar!!!!
