• Hi Guest - Come check out all of the new CP Merch Shop! Now you can support CigarPass buy purchasing hats, apparel, and more...
    Click here to visit! here...

For You Southern and Central Californians

DesertRat

Perpetual Newbie
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
959
Location
Palmdale- Ca
Vandenberg AFB is scheduled to launch a Taurus LX rocket carrying NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory into a low earth polar orbit tomorrow morning Feb. 24. The launch window lies between 1:30 and 2:30 am PST.

The spacecraft will measure carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere.

If the weather is clear, I can see the rocket rise into the sky from my home 200 miles away so if you find yourself up during that time you might want to grab a cigar and head outside, light up, face the coast and see if you can catch a glimpse of the spacecraft as it heads out.

Here she is on her launch pad waiting for the torch to light her off. The rocket is roughly 91' tall and about 8' in diameter.
090223-F-1556P-054.jpg
 
Sweet info, thanks Dan! I almost thought this was some newbie war launch announcement thread thingy... :rolleyes: It's actual good info! :D
 
Thanks for the news. I'll have to head on outside and enjoy the beautiful day we are supposed to have tomorrow. No more rain!! Should be fun to watch.
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=206...OI&refer=us

Satellite to Study Global-Warming Gases Lost in Space (Update3)

Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- A satellite launched from California failed to reach orbit today, crashing into the sea near Antarctica and dooming a $273 million mission to study global-warming gases.

“The mission is lost,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration spokesman Steve Cole said in a telephone interview from the launch site at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

The NASA satellite was to orbit 438 miles (705 kilometers) above Earth and observe how carbon dioxide enters and leaves the atmosphere, helping scientists predict future increases in the main greenhouse gas blamed for global warming. Instead, the satellite fell in the ocean near Antarctica though the mission manager said at no point did the craft pass over land.

“It’s a huge disappointment for the entire team who have worked very hard for years and years and years,” NASA Launch Director Chuck Dovale said in a briefing from California. “Even when you do your very best, you can still fail.”

Today’s malfunction follows a Feb. 11 collision of U.S. and Russian satellites almost 500 miles above the planet, the first crash of its type, which created a space debris field of more than 300 pieces that could damage other satellites.

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory satellite didn’t reach orbit after a 1:55 a.m. launch because the “payload fairing” failed to separate, NASA said. The fairing covers the top of the satellite during launch and needs to come off so the satellite can detach from the rocket and enter orbit.

“It’s disappointing because it was giving us novel information to help us move our understanding forward on global warming,” Alan O’Neill, science director of the Reading, U.K.- based Centre for Earth Observation, said in an interview.

Orbital Sciences

Both the satellite and launch rocket were built by Dulles, Virginia-based Orbital Sciences Corp. John Brunschwyler, Orbital Sciences’s mission manager, said “over the past 10 years, we’ve flown a nearly perfect record -- 56 out of 57 vehicles and we’ve not had any problems with this particular fairing design.”

NASA’s investment was $273 million for the design, development and launch operations. Insurance details on the mission may be given later today, NASA said.

The craft contained a monitoring device designed to collect 8 million measurements every 16 days. Scientists hoped to use the data to find out how much CO2 is absorbed by the forests, grasslands and oceans, which are collectively known as “sinks.”

Man-made CO2, which traps heat in the atmosphere, is largely produced by power plants, vehicle engines and factories.

The data gleaned from the satellite was intended to help guide government global-warming policy, NASA said.

Understanding ‘Carbon Sinks’

“An improved understanding of carbon sinks is essential to predicting future carbon-dioxide increases and making accurate predictions of carbon dioxide’s impact on Earth’s climate,” NASA said on the mission Web site. “If these natural carbon-dioxide sinks become less efficient as the climate changes, the rate of buildup of carbon dioxide would increase.”

On Jan. 23, Japan launched what it said was the world’s first satellite, Gosat, to measure greenhouse gases from 56,000 points around the globe over five years.

Today’s satellite was expected to have a minimum three-year life. Similar spacecraft have lasted five to 10 years, David Steitz, a NASA spokesman, said yesterday.

While launch and separation of the rocket’s first stage went as planned, a clamshell-shaped “fairing” covering the satellite failed to open, meaning it was too heavy to reach orbit, Brunschwyler said on NASA’s online television station.

“As a direct result of carrying that extra weight, we could not reach orbit,” Brunschwyler said. Indications are the satellite “landed just short of Antarctica, in the ocean.”

Earlier this month, the collision of Russian and U.S. satellites destroyed an Iridium Satellite LLC communications craft and a defunct Russian Cosmos 2251, NASA said.

At least 18,000 satellites, debris and other space objects orbiting the Earth are tracked by the U.S. Joint Space Operations center. The Soviet Union put the first satellite, Sputnik 1, into space in 1957.
 
Yup, in typical scientific language, the launch experienced an "anomaly" when the fairing failed to separate from the 2nd stage as required. The payload is now sitting on the bottom of the ocean somewhere near antarctica. I doubt the satellite survived the impact but they will probably attempt a recovery at some point.
 
Does anyone else see the irony in all this? What with the thing laying at the bottom of the ocean and polluting, instead of flying and trying to curb pollution?
 
Hah, this is great, I was just watching the West Wing episode where NASA gets chewed out for being famous for failures instead of successes and then I read the article about this rocket failure.
 
Top