In the defense of the writer of the article (I know, flame away), he is just reporting medical news. Maybe it's because I also work in news, but I believe to bash the NY Times or the journalist for reporting this is unfair, if anything bash the medical journal in which it was published, or the researchers themselves. Or better yet don't bash anything but rather read the article, form your own opinion, and leave it at that. This study was done a while ago and has, over the past few weeks, appeared in just about every news outlet and it also aired through my outlet. As a medical journalist it'd be irresponsible for this guy not to report on any major medical findings.
Except it isn't a major medical finding it's a Doctor with an agenda. I understand what you are saying flamchop, but it's the news media reporting of such tripe, in a sensationalist manner, that has had a lot to do with a lot of us being forced to stand outside of a cigar-lounge or pub and smoke in the rain.
*steps off soap box. Commence nasty comments aimed in my general direction.
With that said I think the study is garbage and it's just some more nonsense to cause everyone to unnecessarily freak out because they have nothing better to do. To be "concerned" about this third hand smoke is really stupid considering what we are all exposed to and breathe in on a daily basis.
And since you also think it is garbage, how do you justify the first part of your post? Is it not the reporter's creed to only report the truth? Sadly I think we both know the answer to that.