bryan_h said:
From what Ive been reading the BEFSX41 is the first Linksys product to really get the SPI right. Some others have it, but most reviews agree that the older routers performs better with SPI off. Id rather have the one that works than the one that doesnt. I built my PC myself and I dont want to risk its security. An extra $20 wont kill me. Thanks though!
Bryan :thumbs:
This is why I reccommended the NetGear first.
Netgear has always had SPI right. If you are really worried about security or have had a 12 year old DDOS you offline because you are beating him at a FPS game, you will appreaciate having the SPI. If you are really concerned about security SPI is a "real" firewall instead of "sortof" a firewall as NAT is.
As Brian pointed out, the BEFSX41 is the first Linksys to do SPI right without big performance hits; in the past with LinkSys you had to choose between performance and security - the BEFSX41 seems to be getting have it right now.
The Netgears have been doing SPI right for 4+ years now, and the price of these products have dropped from $250+ back then to the $70 range now. I see no reason to buy a $40 is NAT router when you can have a SPI router in the $70 range - especially since he doesn't require WiFi.
As another reader pointed out the configuration of NetGears isn't
quite as easy as LinkSys but I think any semi-competant person should be able to figure it out. But since the BEFSX41 doesn't take the performance hit, is a bit easier to configure, and a couple bucks cheaper it would be a good choice as well.
Brian, I would use the Surfboard modem still though - there is no reason to buy another cable modem unless you really want them to match in external appearance. The motorola surfboards are top notch cable modems.
Matt