Add me to the not too impressed list. I've even had a few that had about four years or more age on them that did nothing for me. Nicely made cigars that just did not have any flavor that jumped out at me.
I hope that your local owner is wanting to look at expanding his lines way beyond Perdomo and a few others. I hate it when you go into a shop that has just a stock of everyday yard gars, and then a few smatterings of what most would call premiums.
It's also a turn off when the owner is really big on one certain brand that he is always trying to steer you towards every time you go in.
Phil's connection in the industry have allowed him to get cigars which other young B&M's can't; he has been given access to the entire Fuente line already (including Opus X) and he has a decent selection of DPG, Padron, Oliva, etc. Although nobody buys the Serie 26 Padron because of how over-priced they are

(hi Brian). One thing I have found from hanging out a great deal at the B&M is that 85% of the patrons smoke sub premium cigars and although they are willing to buy more expensive cigars (to patronize the shop) they don't have a clue what to spend their money on.
Here is my take on Perdomo at this point:
Perdomo makes fair priced cigars in the mild-medium flavor profile which most of us don’t care for, but probably do appeal to the average B&M buyer. Furthermore, it seems that almost all of their cigars fit into one of 4-5 vitolas, Robusto, Toro, or Churchill, 54 or 44 ring gauge, and no figurados.
These two issues may allow them to net a few more points of margin because they can employ lesser skilled rollers and they do not have to produce the super expensive tobacco. If this is a niche, and is by design, then they may very well be brilliant business people. If they attempt to tell me they make “better stuff” than Fuente, Tatuaje, DPG, or Padron for example, then we might have a problem.
THANK YOU TO ALL OF YOU FOR YOUR HONEST OPINIONS......KEEP EM COMING :thumbs: