Please PING this IP

[CoventryCat86]

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping 204.157.9.189

Pinging 204.157.9.189 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=51
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=51
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=51
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 204.157.9.189:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 17ms

Did I do that right? ???

 

[xraydoc1]

Birmingham, AL Charter Cable

Pinging 204.157.9.189 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=53
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=53
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=53
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 204.157.9.189:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 28ms

 

[Savage112]

CTCTEL in ND(work DSL)

Pinging 204.157.9.189 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=49
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=49
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=49
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 204.157.9.189:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 92ms, Maximum = 93ms, Average = 92ms

 

[emodx]

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping 204.157.9.189

Pinging 204.157.9.189 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=51
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=51
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=51
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 204.157.9.189:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 17ms

Did I do that right? ???

[snapback]265936[/snapback]​

No, that was absolutely horrible. So are you in my pass or not? Need an addy if you are Crabtree.

 

[Wascal]

from SW Va.

Target Name: unknown189.9.157.204.defenderhosting.com
IP: 204.157.9.189
Date/Time: 12/23/2005 8:45:15 AM

1 48 ms * 48 ms 48 ms 47 ms 48 ms 64-4-96-1.dmt.ntelos.net [64.4.96.1]
2 51 ms 66 ms 49 ms 52 ms 48 ms 48 ms [64.203.191.225]
3 49 ms 48 ms 48 ms 50 ms 48 ms 47 ms GI3-3-0.WBO-GSR.ntelos.net [64.203.190.134]
4 56 ms 55 ms 55 ms 56 ms 54 ms 55 ms ash-B-tvl-bdr.core.ntelos.net [209.145.84.42]
5 56 ms 55 ms 56 ms 56 ms 56 ms 56 ms ge6-14.colo02.ash01.pccwbtn.net [206.223.115.48]
6 56 ms 55 ms 108 ms 56 ms 56 ms 58 ms dtg.ge9-11.br02.ash01.pccwbtn.net [63.218.94.6]
7 56 ms 55 ms 56 ms 55 ms 55 ms 58 ms eqash40.defenderhosting.com [204.157.0.143]
8 58 ms 55 ms 56 ms 64 ms 57 ms 57 ms unknown189.9.157.204.defenderhosting.com [204.157.9.189]

 

[violin_faerie]

Kansas City, MO, Road-Runner cable-based ISP.

ping results for www.cigarpass.com

Ping has started ...

PING cigarpass.com (204.157.9.189): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=49.765 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=51.187 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=58.968 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=48.721 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=51.808 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=49.575 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=49.504 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=50.316 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=48.692 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=51.548 ms

--- cigarpass.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 48.692/51.008/58.968 ms


Ping Results for 204.157.9.189:

Ping has started ...

PING 204.157.9.189 (204.157.9.189): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=64.071 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=52.646 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=48.787 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=48.857 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=49.095 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=48.842 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=58.068 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=61.016 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=50.149 ms
64 bytes from 204.157.9.189: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=53.846 ms

--- 204.157.9.189 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 48.787/53.537/64.071 ms

 

[bigmac]

From Macon Georgia, cox.net


Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Mike>ping 204.157.9.189

Pinging 204.157.9.189 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=54
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=54
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=54
Reply from 204.157.9.189: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 204.157.9.189:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 29ms

 

[Rod]

Thanks for the info guys. You can stop pinging now.