• Hi Guest - Come check out all of the new CP Merch Shop! Now you can support CigarPass buy purchasing hats, apparel, and more...
    Click here to visit! here...

SCHIP & Tobacco Politics

Status
Not open for further replies.

highdudgeon

New Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
48
Location
Birmingham, AL
Okay, I'm guessing that I'll probably draw fire here, but let's go.

Cigar media routinely bashes SCHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program, see http://www.cms.hhs.gov/home/schip.asp and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Childre...urance_Program). They are overjoyed that Bush has used his rare veto to overturn a program that would expand healthcare for uninsured children largely with taxes on tobacco products.

Now, let me get one thing straight: there are 41 million Americans without health insurance. Most are children. SCHIP, since 1997, has helped over 5 million families with children get the insurance their children need in order to thrive. Preventative medicine is more cost effective and healthy and inexpensive than trips to the ER by uninsured patients. Helping poor children is an unquestionable good.

Meanwhile, few people can argue with a straight face that Big Tobacco in US has been a Bad Thing. This has been one of the most nefarious and frankly disgraceful industries, bar none, selling dangerous products to all comers -- including children.

Also, no one in their right mind can argue that tobacco is entirely safe. Smoking cigarettes is dangerous, carries a high risk of numerous and potentially deadly healh problems. Cigars are safer, no doubt, but second-hand smoke is an issue and cancer of the mouth is no sniffing matter. However, I smoke cigars, avidly so, I understand the risks, and I know they are puny compared to a two-pack a day habit of smoke into the lungs. Cigarettes are an addictive and, as far as I'm concerned, foul habit that is a Bad Thing for healthy living. Cigars? You can be a track star and smoke cigars.

So, the tax is on tobacco products and, overwhelmingly, on cigarettes. Fine. People in Europe pay much more for cigarettes and Americans should, too. It might even dissuade some smokers.

Cigars? This is largely a luxury market for most of us. I don't think I have one cigar that costs under $4 in my collection. The average is probably around $7-12, depending on country of origin, a stick and some a good bit more. Do I really mind paying a few cents or even a buck more for my vice knowing that it will help children in need? No. I view it as a civic responsibility. I am partaking of a luxury, it is a luxury not without risks to me and to the healthcare system, and there is a dire need for young people to get the health care they need. Is your dime or dollar per stick that important? Is it, really, that you're willing to undermine the program?

Sure, we can tax other things. I live in Europe is gas is something like eight-ten bucks a gallon depending where you are. We can tax chocolate, bedding, whatever. Tobacco makes sense, though, because the profit margins are there, the problems to society are there, and I could care less about people crazy enough to still smoke cigarettes given all we know about its evils. As for cigars, well, why not? The tax is small, compared to cigarettes, and few of us have a six cigar a day habit. Frankly, I think we should feel proud to own up to some civic responsibility and not bitch and moan about a small hit on the pocketbook. If everyone did that about everything, we would have no taxes, and that would mean no government.
 
This really isn't the place to discuss this sort of thing. If you do a search you will find that this topic has been discussed before in a very thorough manner. There's no need to go through it again. Do you pay taxes in America?

It sounds like your just tying to stir things up with this post.
 
Why tax 1% of the market to provide benefit to 70-80% of population tax video game,fast food, designer clothing companies. That is were people who dont have money waste it. Why should 1% of us pay for the rest tax everyone.
 
Okay, I'm guessing that I'll probably draw fire here, but let's go.

Cigar media routinely bashes SCHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program, see http://www.cms.hhs.gov/home/schip.asp and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Childre...urance_Program). They are overjoyed that Bush has used his rare veto to overturn a program that would expand healthcare for uninsured children largely with taxes on tobacco products.

Now, let me get one thing straight: there are 41 million Americans without health insurance. Most are children. SCHIP, since 1997, has helped over 5 million families with children get the insurance their children need in order to thrive. Preventative medicine is more cost effective and healthy and inexpensive than trips to the ER by uninsured patients. Helping poor children is an unquestionable good.

Meanwhile, few people can argue with a straight face that Big Tobacco in US has been a Bad Thing. This has been one of the most nefarious and frankly disgraceful industries, bar none, selling dangerous products to all comers -- including children.

Also, no one in their right mind can argue that tobacco is entirely safe. Smoking cigarettes is dangerous, carries a high risk of numerous and potentially deadly healh problems. Cigars are safer, no doubt, but second-hand smoke is an issue and cancer of the mouth is no sniffing matter. However, I smoke cigars, avidly so, I understand the risks, and I know they are puny compared to a two-pack a day habit of smoke into the lungs. Cigarettes are an addictive and, as far as I'm concerned, foul habit that is a Bad Thing for healthy living. Cigars? You can be a track star and smoke cigars.

So, the tax is on tobacco products and, overwhelmingly, on cigarettes. Fine. People in Europe pay much more for cigarettes and Americans should, too. It might even dissuade some smokers.

Cigars? This is largely a luxury market for most of us. I don't think I have one cigar that costs under $4 in my collection. The average is probably around $7-12, depending on country of origin, a stick and some a good bit more. Do I really mind paying a few cents or even a buck more for my vice knowing that it will help children in need? No. I view it as a civic responsibility. I am partaking of a luxury, it is a luxury not without risks to me and to the healthcare system, and there is a dire need for young people to get the health care they need. Is your dime or dollar per stick that important? Is it, really, that you're willing to undermine the program?

Sure, we can tax other things. I live in Europe is gas is something like eight-ten bucks a gallon depending where you are. We can tax chocolate, bedding, whatever. Tobacco makes sense, though, because the profit margins are there, the problems to society are there, and I could care less about people crazy enough to still smoke cigarettes given all we know about its evils. As for cigars, well, why not? The tax is small, compared to cigarettes, and few of us have a six cigar a day habit. Frankly, I think we should feel proud to own up to some civic responsibility and not bitch and moan about a small hit on the pocketbook. If everyone did that about everything, we would have no taxes, and that would mean no government.

Wow... the ignorance in your post is infuriating. I want to shout my rebuttals at you... I guess this is why politics is frowned upon on the CP boards. :whistling:

Edit: to add the quote for clarity.
 
Yes, I pay taxes in America. Federal and state.

I'm not trying to stir things up. This is something that really concerns me -- my wife is in healthcare, I know the issues, and I just don't get people's intransigence on the issue.

This is interesting and to the point:

http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/cigars

Cigar smokers tend to, ahem, be better educated and have higher incomes. IE, by and large, this isn't really a hit on us.

This really isn't the place to discuss this sort of thing. If you do a search you will find that this topic has been discussed before in a very thorough manner. There's no need to go through it again. Do you pay taxes in America?

It sounds like your just tying to stir things up with this post.
 
Your an idiot the tax is not proportional tax the whole damn population. Or if you are so eager to pay more write uncle sam a check don't inflict it on me.
 
Well, first of all, because someone has to. Also, because tobacco products, unlike designer clothing, are actually harmful. And, also, cigarette smokers are not 1% of the population.

Look, I don't mind paying taxes. I have my deductions, sure, and we are in a pretty high bracket (medical professional married to legal and educational professional). I pay my taxes despite my misgivings about many of my government's policies. I do so because paying taxes is a responsibility.

All I am saying is that I PERSONALLY DO NOT MIND SCHIP and, in fact, believe that it is tantamount to cruelty to hold it up because certain lobbies are concerned about their profit margins.

Ultimately, somebody has to pay, and I PERSONALLY THINK that it makes sense for those of us who support an industry that produces harmful products to pay our share.

PS, ignorance? Oh, boy, that's a good one. I guess I spent a decade on the Hill doing policy work for nothing.

Look, nothing personal and, if you take offense politically, either don't respond or respond with reasoned argument.

Why tax 1% of the market to provide benefit to 70-80% of population tax video game,fast food, designer clothing companies. That is were people who dont have money waste it. Why should 1% of us pay for the rest tax everyone.
 
Okay, I'm guessing that I'll probably draw fire here, but let's go.


I'm not trying to stir things up.

Ehh? :whistling:

Overlooking the obvious flaws in SCHIP (expansion of coverage to people age 25, illegal aliens, families earning more than enough income, etc) Your justification of the tax plays on basic class envy. It is illogical to tax cigar smokers to pay for children's health care - It's that simple. We have done nothing to contribute to their illness or poverty.

Your "save the children" - "you're all a bunch of greedy, affluent, SOBs" type of arguments will not get you far with this audience. If the program needs more funding, it should be funded by general taxes just like any other handout social welfare program. But the expansion would cover MANY more people than the original SCHIP was designed to do.

Again, this is not the place for politics. I'm finding it hard to hold my tongue around you.
 
There are a lot of healthcare problems most of wich are not caused by tobbacco. obesity is definately not and a lot of folks who "cant" afford insurance are wearing designer clothes have xbox 360 and 52 inch plasma tv's with a rocking surround sound system. I think if they chose healthcare over luxery they might find a way to afford it. The fact that you state you spent decades on the hill tell me you are probably associated with lobbyists of some sort so please just go away don't need your type here.
 
Let's see -- you're in Graf and you're up and you are poorly spoken, so you're either some lowly GS or enlisted guy. Trust me, I outrank you.

Now, the name-calling. Happened yesterday with Gary, and then a dozen people wrote saying that I should take him seriously. Now, I post a reasoned query and I get "ignorant" and "idiot." I know, I just just flush my Ph.D.

So, you intelligent wonder, you are right: the tax is not proportional. And that is the point! Can you not read? It is a tax on harmful products and not on the population as it whole. It overwhelming affects, as it should cigarette smokers. And, if you want ignorant, look to anyone who still smokes cigarettes and does not actively try to quit.

As for me, I have had it with this forum. I've been on god-only-knows how many and I've never met such a ball-swinging rude crowd before. I am out of here. You'll be grateful and I sure as hell am. Don't bother replying because I won't be looking here anymore.

Your an idiot the tax is not proportional tax the whole damn population. Or if you are so eager to pay more write uncle sam a check don't inflict it on me.
 
Let's see -- you're in Graf and you're up and you are poorly spoken, so you're either some lowly GS or enlisted guy. Trust me, I outrank you.

Now, the name-calling. Happened yesterday with Gary, and then a dozen people wrote saying that I should take him seriously. Now, I post a reasoned query and I get "ignorant" and "idiot." I know, I just just flush my Ph.D.

So, you intelligent wonder, you are right: the tax is not proportional. And that is the point! Can you not read? It is a tax on harmful products and not on the population as it whole. It overwhelming affects, as it should cigarette smokers. And, if you want ignorant, look to anyone who still smokes cigarettes and does not actively try to quit.

As for me, I have had it with this forum. I've been on god-only-knows how many and I've never met such a ball-swinging rude crowd before. I am out of here. You'll be grateful and I sure as hell am. Don't bother replying because I won't be looking here anymore.

Your an idiot the tax is not proportional tax the whole damn population. Or if you are so eager to pay more write uncle sam a check don't inflict it on me.
 
Let's see -- you're in Graf and you're up and you are poorly spoken, so you're either some lowly GS or enlisted guy. Trust me, I outrank you.

Now, the name-calling. Happened yesterday with Gary, and then a dozen people wrote saying that I should take him seriously. Now, I post a reasoned query and I get "ignorant" and "idiot." I know, I just just flush my Ph.D.

So, you intelligent wonder, you are right: the tax is not proportional. And that is the point! Can you not read? It is a tax on harmful products and not on the population as it whole. It overwhelming affects, as it should cigarette smokers. And, if you want ignorant, look to anyone who still smokes cigarettes and does not actively try to quit.

As for me, I have had it with this forum. I've been on god-only-knows how many and I've never met such a ball-swinging rude crowd before. I am out of here. You'll be grateful and I sure as hell am. Don't bother replying because I won't be looking here anymore. :sign:

Your an idiot the tax is not proportional tax the whole damn population. Or if you are so eager to pay more write uncle sam a check don't inflict it on me.
 
Well, that's your view, isn't it? Some of us believe in bettering the world around us. Some are rather more selfish.

Okay, I'm guessing that I'll probably draw fire here, but let's go.


I'm not trying to stir things up.

Ehh? :whistling:

Overlooking the obvious flaws in SCHIP (expansion of coverage to people age 25, illegal aliens, families earning more than enough income, etc) Your justification of the tax plays on basic class envy. It is illogical to tax cigar smokers to pay for children's health care - It's that simple. We have done nothing to contribute to their illness or poverty.

Your "save the children" - "you're all a bunch of greedy, affluent, SOBs" type of arguments will not get you far with this audience. If the program needs more funding, it should be funded by general taxes just like any other handout social welfare program. But the expansion would cover MANY more people than the original SCHIP was designed to do.

Again, this is not the place for politics. I'm finding it hard to hold my tongue around you.
 
one no such thing as a lowly GI your stupid for saying that. I may not be as highly edumacated as you as for outranking me I dont think that matters here. The fact that you talk bad about the Armed forces says a lot about you and your charector. I just do not have a spell check on this machine.
 
Don't bother replying because I won't be looking here anymore. :sign:

I knew it was too soon to be true. ... :sign:

Well, that's your view, isn't it? Some of us believe in bettering the world around us. Some are rather more selfish.

Your "save the children" - "you're all a bunch of greedy, affluent, SOBs" type of arguments will not get you far with this audience.
Oh god, how did I call it before it happened? :D
 
Nope, not associated with lobbiests. Not in the slightest. Worked on ethics issues, mainly.

Sure, there are lots of problems out there and you name some of them. But, the vast and overwhelming number of people who don't have health insurance also do not have xboxes and plasma TVs. Think you can do that with a family of four on the minimum wage? Think again.

But, yeah, I'm going away. All the avatars, almost without exception, are crude and sexist. The language crude and ignorant. The personal attacks like none I have seen on the Internet.

But, hey, for people like you, Bush must be a Godsend. Wonder what it is like to be in the .5% of humanity on that issue?

Ciao.

There are a lot of healthcare problems most of wich are not caused by tobbacco. obesity is definately not and a lot of folks who "cant" afford insurance are wearing designer clothes have xbox 360 and 52 inch plasma tv's with a rocking surround sound system. I think if they chose healthcare over luxery they might find a way to afford it. The fact that you state you spent decades on the hill tell me you are probably associated with lobbyists of some sort so please just go away don't need your type here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top