Thanks for the post, Bacchus. Actually, I had your name in there. Where it reads "Some consider them to be too bland" used to read "Bacchus considers them to be too bland..." But I edited it out. Not that I thought that you would care but just that it wasn't necessary.BACCHUS said:Blair:
If you like them, it doesn't matter what I (or anyone else) think of them. They are an inexpensive smoke, and I would take advantage of them if I liked them. You like them, so it would be perfectly reasonable for you to buy them. I sometimes catch grief from certain people (not to name names, Bill ) because I like cigars that he wouldn't touch. On the other hand, some cigars he really likes have few redeeming qualities for me. It is all a matter of individual taste.
My taste buds are fried from years of spicy food, full-bodied cigars and strong alcohol. You, on the other hand, can still taste subtle differences in flavor that are lost on me. I say go for it!
Take care, Bacchus
That is a very true statement. They DO have a terrible burn. But, with these cigars, for some it doesn't bother me that they are so sloppy.lucasbuck said:and it canoed worst then any stick I've ever smoked.
They are changing the blend for the next run. I'm looking forward to trying those when they are released. That sweet black wrapper has a lot of promise.Ellman said:Didnt they change the blend of filler because it was to bland. and that why they are on sale at jr.
Will I thought you liked all the cigars I smoke!BACCHUS said:I sometimes catch grief from certain people (not to name names, Bill ) because I like cigars that he wouldn't touch. On the other hand, some cigars he really likes have few redeeming qualities for me. It is all a matter of individual taste.