vewyphishy
The Original Smoking Fish
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2003
- Messages
- 2,739
Why bother signing multi-year contracts if you're just going to hold-out if you have a breakout season? I don't see owners having the same leverage to withhold salaries if a player sucks it up. You don't see Mo Vaughn of the Mets complaining, do you? Sitting on a fat stack of cash (I believe $15 mil this year) and hasn't nor will he play a single game this year. You think the owner is happy giving this guy $15 mil of his money? What about the year after Aikman retired from the Cowboys? Jerry Jones still coughed up some $10 million.
If you sign a 3-year contract, then you will and SHOULD serve by the terms of that contract for... THREE YEARS. Shocking, I know.
As I see it, the player signs a multi-year deal. If they play like ****, they still get their money. If they play better than their contract pays them, they hold out for more. Since when is this a logical concept? How many of us can do that at our respective jobs?
As for McKenzie (and any other whiny bitch athlete), I feel no sympathy for them. Yes, they may step on the field tomorrow, blow out their knee, and end their career. Boo freaking hoo. Most, if not all sports contracts today come with an injury clause that pays out the terms of their contract (or a substantial percentage of it) over a longer period of time. They will still have made more money in the few years of playing than most of us will make over the course of a lifetime. Let's not also forget a small detail... they get played to play a GAME.
I enjoy sports and the entertainment it brings, but I do NOT support spoiled bratty athletes who cry because they can't afford to buy a 3rd Bentley or a 5th vacation home in Tahiti. I don't care that you think you should be making $5 mil a year instead of $3. In fact, I hope you DO blow out your knee. Then you might be able to join the rest of us in the real world.
If you sign a 3-year contract, then you will and SHOULD serve by the terms of that contract for... THREE YEARS. Shocking, I know.
As I see it, the player signs a multi-year deal. If they play like ****, they still get their money. If they play better than their contract pays them, they hold out for more. Since when is this a logical concept? How many of us can do that at our respective jobs?
As for McKenzie (and any other whiny bitch athlete), I feel no sympathy for them. Yes, they may step on the field tomorrow, blow out their knee, and end their career. Boo freaking hoo. Most, if not all sports contracts today come with an injury clause that pays out the terms of their contract (or a substantial percentage of it) over a longer period of time. They will still have made more money in the few years of playing than most of us will make over the course of a lifetime. Let's not also forget a small detail... they get played to play a GAME.
I enjoy sports and the entertainment it brings, but I do NOT support spoiled bratty athletes who cry because they can't afford to buy a 3rd Bentley or a 5th vacation home in Tahiti. I don't care that you think you should be making $5 mil a year instead of $3. In fact, I hope you DO blow out your knee. Then you might be able to join the rest of us in the real world.