- Joined
- Jan 31, 2005
- Messages
- 9,865
Nope, not the standard 'set and forget' from Bob......
...that's my take on it. When this is running properly (almost there), it's super consistent and if something changes a point or more, it's time to take a look....But if you're monitoring humidity, why sweat tank level? If humidity goes below your low threshold, you know to check the water.
For simple, I'd rather see the float attach to the top and hang vertical. The bulkhead fitting could be a potential leak down the road unless it was always above the water level.
But if you're monitoring humidity, why sweat tank level? If humidity goes below your low threshold, you know to check the water.
View attachment 25147
These look cool. It would only take a simple circuit to complete a monitoring system
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.com/ulk/itm/382127569808
Unfortunately it only has a "no water" alarm, when the humidity drops below a certain level... which your new controller should also have Tom...Doesn't it have a low water alarm?
I new it had a alarm for water didn't know it was no water.Unfortunately it only had a "no water" alarm... which your new controller should also have Tom...
Yes, I had edited my response to include "when the humidity drops below a certain level" it can be set within the controller. I have mine set at 65 percent.I new it had a alarm for water didn't know it was no water.