mrjinglesusa
CP Chemist
So because one MLB player over did it and subsequently decided to drive drunk, MLB clubhouses are now banning beer. ??? This, despite the fact that the home field Hancock played in is named after a beer maker. :sign:
Does this strike anyone else as bit hypocritical? These franchises sell beer to people for 3+ hours (with little to no concern of how this people are getting home) and yet they won't allow their players to enjoy a cold one after a game in the clubhouse? WTF?
162 games a year. 30 men on a roster + coaches and managers x 2 teams each game. Let's assume (for the sake of argument) that 20 people from each team have a beer or two after each game. That's about 6,480 instances (40 people x 162 games) where a ballplayer is drinking a beer after a game throughout the season, not counting playoffs and World Series. Out of these, ONE person over does it, drives drunk, and gets killed. That's 0.015%. That's in ONE season. While a tradegy, I don't think it warrants banning beer in clubhouses.
This knee-jerk reaction of some people to tradegy is getting ridiculous. What do they hope to accomplish by this? Do they not think that players won't simply drive somewhere after a game and drink there?
I hope this isn't overly "political" (I didn't think it was). If so, feel free to lock it up Rod.
Does this strike anyone else as bit hypocritical? These franchises sell beer to people for 3+ hours (with little to no concern of how this people are getting home) and yet they won't allow their players to enjoy a cold one after a game in the clubhouse? WTF?
162 games a year. 30 men on a roster + coaches and managers x 2 teams each game. Let's assume (for the sake of argument) that 20 people from each team have a beer or two after each game. That's about 6,480 instances (40 people x 162 games) where a ballplayer is drinking a beer after a game throughout the season, not counting playoffs and World Series. Out of these, ONE person over does it, drives drunk, and gets killed. That's 0.015%. That's in ONE season. While a tradegy, I don't think it warrants banning beer in clubhouses.
This knee-jerk reaction of some people to tradegy is getting ridiculous. What do they hope to accomplish by this? Do they not think that players won't simply drive somewhere after a game and drink there?
I hope this isn't overly "political" (I didn't think it was). If so, feel free to lock it up Rod.