oak
Let it burn...
I'll weigh in since you asked for additional opinions. Obviously, my opinion is biased by a lack of experience - as all of this is fairly new to me. I've been in 3 passes total - and all in the last 30 days (and only 1 one on this board) - so take this opinion for what ya paid for it. Also, sorry to be long-winded, but when U weigh in this late in a thread - it seems wise to go ahead and cover all the details of my opinion up-front.cohibasurfer said:Now I would be interested in the opinion of others on the proposed P's& T's. If you were in a pass or the pass host for that matter. How would you view them. Please don't use I want people to try cigars they haven't so .... I'm talking on a level of fairness. I will be posting some different scenerios as well. So check back often. I will be here all zee week!
When doing a pass, I try and tend to start with MSRP, then search a couple sites and find out the street value and both actual and perceived rarity. I don't use any one source, and if I am unfamiliar with a particular stick, I research it first - checking various sites, including this one and other boards. However, 1 or 2 domestic sites and 1 or 2 habana sources are usually plenty to know where something falls - so most sticks take 5 minutes to research max. If I'm not confident, I sometimes check in with the pass host or a FOG - but normally, I just avoid a take altogether (because if I'm not confident, there is probably a good reason for that fact). This process varies somewhat from pass to pass, and even take to take (some take 2 minutes to research - some take 2 hours).
However, I don't really think my exact process is really relevant to the question at hand. The bottom line of my opinion is: Someone took the time to put together the pass and start it off, took the time of dealing with the mental overhead (which, if your pass hits some drama - is not insignificant), and took the initial risk. I'm damn-well going to do my homework, and more importantly, I'm going to err on the side of caution. I don't need a set of precise rules for puts and takes, because I respect the original passer enough to deal with any ambiguity and make sure it is (at least) fair no matter how you look at it. I'm not interested in nickle and diming, and I prefer my plays to be clear enough that no one would ever bother to add up worth to double-check.
This post is not a dig at anyone - but I simply don't agree with the desire to boil all this down to a specific set of rules that are unambiguous. I wouldn't mind additional rules or resources, but they wouldn't be particularly relevant to me. This opinion is really no different than the rules now posted on this site for overall conduct. Do I mind them? Nope. Do I need to read them? Of course not. Pretty much all those rules are inherent (or should be, IMO) - and are part of being a respectful and professional human-being - I don't need anyone to list them for me. Now just to be clear: Creating and posting those rules was 100% the right thing, and I am glad they got up - because they were needed. However, I'm not happy that there was a need to post them in the first place.
This same logic applies to the creation of a centralized database of stick "worth". Would I love to have access to such a tool? Sure. It would save me time, but is in no way required, and I would never use any single database as my sole source for making a decision anyway. Why? Because I give a crap about the pass host and want to make sure it works out right for everyone involved.
Cheers,
- Oak