Porn Stars……..

punk_lawyer

Habeas Punkus
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
2,058
That's pretty weird stuff.  I respect the fact that some of these girls participated in the 'study'.  With porn being a 'glamour' profession, I would have thought that getting girls to pose for a less than glamorous photo would be difficult.
 

fjldo

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
821
I agree, getting them to pose without makeup could be difficult, but I'm willing to bet they didn't do it for free!  I suspect they'll do just about anything to earn a dollar!
 

kann

One Leg Of Fury.
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
8,110
I only got through the first ten or so, but they all seem to be from the same make up artist.  Wonder if she took these pics for her portfolio and SHE is the one that released them, rather than the "stars".  There was a group of these earlier this year where it did say the participants were well-paid (or paid, at least) for their ugly mugs transformation.  
 

Mrepp

To boldly troll where no Troll has trolled before
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
2,328
kann said:
I only got through the first ten or so, but they all seem to be from the same make up artist.  Wonder if she took these pics for her portfolio and SHE is the one that released them, rather than the "stars".  There was a group of these earlier this year where it did say the participants were well-paid (or paid, at least) for their ugly mugs transformation.
^ this! There is a lot more than make up going on here if you look their using camera and lighting tricks too. Almost as if to amplify the "without makeup" pictures. If you look at the background it's easy to see the lighting, exposure changes ect. My bet is someone trying to beef up their portfolio and show dramatic changes. So it's probably not a true representation of what they look like in natural light without makeup. Just my 2cents.
 
Top