vitasea said:
i am really surprised,this is the first bad commit i have had. maybe you got a bad one i will send you another, it can happpen.
[snapback]172916[/snapback]
The bottom line is that it just did not taste like a Cohiba -- even a bad/sick Cohiba. Now certainly I am not as experienced with the Cohiba brand as some are here.
However, I have burned through enough boxes from trusted sources to know the flavor profile of a Cohiba, at varying stages of aging. I'm looking forward to others smoking these, perhaps back to back with known-authentic Cohibas, and posting their views.
Vitasea, I want to be clear that I'm not accusing you of any wrongdoing at all; and you do not need to send me anything more. I have seen a number of people who have "friends" in Cuba who sell off cheap farm rolled cigars are pass them off as authentic brands.
I think that's likely what has happened here. Perhaps they started you off on the real thing, and did the bait and switch later. Perhaps they've always been fake. Perhaps what you're still getting is a mix of real and fake Cohibas.
Simply coming from the island of Cuba does not make a cigar a Cohiba; there's a specific type of tobacco, grown in a specific place, fermented/cured a specific way, and blended/rolled in a specific manner.
I'd also like to add that for cigars that are purported to be from 2003, the Esplendido that you sent me smelled very fresh, and the tobacco had the taste and look/feel of very fresh tobacco. Granted, 2 years is not a lot of aging time for a cigar, but still, these seemed remarkably new.
The difficulty here is that it's hard to know whether all of the cigars being sent to various people are from the same origin. Still, I'm looking forward to hearing what Matt R, LucasBuck, SamClemmons, et al have to say about these cigars.
[snapback]172953[/snapback]