Well heck, I might as well give you another target to shoot at. I switched to Apple five years ago, but I still had a love for certain aspects of Windows so I ran Parallels with XP (not a prob in the world including my wife having to VM to her office running Oracle).
After the wife retired I re-evaluated my needs for Windows programs (do I want a second partition and upgrade to Parallels 6?).
What I found is Apple is increasing their following in exponential ways, so what I needed to run on Windows before I can now run on Apple. AutoCad is a prime example or a major program acknowledging Apple ain't a tumbleweed in a windstorm.
Having said all that, Apple still can't run most of the PC's game (games is the key word here); but when Microsoft makes Office for Mac, that is telling you something. Then of course, PopCap and EA are porting their games over. Now there isn't much an Apple can't do.
It is a choice between you and your wallet and where you want to be technology wise, and we all know it's only going to continue to grow. Look a cable companies losing customers (and they are not going to Dish or Directv), they are going to Google and soon to be Apple TV and that will be the next big deal. You can see the postal system dying because of email, and the next will be television doing things we can't even were possible years ago.
So what did I just say here: it's like a cigar. I simply can not afford a Padron 46, so I stick with my Padron 2000. Same with computers, you can go insane to buy a $3000 game killer, or a decent PC or Mac to do more than enough to keep the average side of you happy. That Padron 46 or that Davidoff Habana will just have to wait for better times.
Sorry brothers, but today is Sunday, and this was my sermon for the month (and Jon, I can hear you yelling to shudup already.) :love: