• Hi Guest - Come check out all of the new CP Merch Shop! Now you can support CigarPass buy purchasing hats, apparel, and more...
    Click here to visit! here...

Cigar pass rating experiment

CgarDan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
6,011
This will be a fun and simple experiment to see how we rate cigars

Here is the point system
Total points = 100. Construction - 30 points. Flavor profile - 40 points. Complexity - 20 points. Esthetics/appearance - 10 points

There will be 5 cigars sent to the participants. Once you are done with smoking the cigar just PM me your rating with a number given to each of the 4 categories above. Feel free to add a simple review if you wish - nothing complex just what you liked and what you did not

I will send the cigars the week of January 9th. Total purchase will not exceed $75 including shipping.

Let’s have the rating deadline as end of Feb. this will give everyone a month and a half to do this Once I have the ratings from everyone I will post the average rating for that cigar and any comments given. Will also keep a spreadsheet if someone wants to see full data

Participants so far:

1) @CigarStone
2) @Pugman1943
3) @CBoukal
4) @cabaiguan juan
5) @lherzolite
6) @Gavin
7) @JoeMO
8) @SKYDIVNEKD
9) @Nate1977
10) @H. Vachon
11) @drunkfish3
12) @cohibasurfer
13) @Le Primauguet
14) @Smokemorestressless
15) @thinde

Would love to have 2 more people to do this with the bands on to see if there is any difference in rating for both methods

Let’s keep the total participants at no more than 20

I already bought 2 boxes and will post the total once I acquire the remaining boxes

Let me know if I missed anyone
 
Hello Dan,
I will play if there's open spots.
 
Blind , but think it would be interesting to have a 1/2 blind and 1/2 non blind
 
Dan,

Why not move me off the "blind" section and into the "not blind" section? I'm good with it as the "scales of justice are blind"!!! 🤣 🥃 🥃 🥃 🤣 I can do this experiment knowing what the sticks are. I promise!

Floyd T
 
Dan,

Why not move me off the "blind" section and into the "not blind" section? I'm good with it as the "scales of justice are blind"!!! 🤣 🥃 🥃 🥃 🤣 I can do this experiment knowing what the sticks are. I promise!

Floyd T
Thanks Floyd

Blind

1) @CigarStone https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213090483815
2) @Pugman1943 https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213090684021
3) @CBoukal https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213090904785
4) @cabaiguan juan https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096056457
5) @lherzolite https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096343724
6) @Gavin https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096385380
7) @JoeMO https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096296624
9) @Nate1977 https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096549157
10) @H. Vachon https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096739428
11) @drunkfish3 https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096720501
12) @cohibasurfer https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096146530
13) @Le Primauguet https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096695045
14) @Smokemorestressless https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096917079
15) @thinde https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213096906660
16) @modo22 https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213091090395
17) @wingman1974 https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213091832957


Non Blind
8) @SKYDIVNEKD https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213090731718
18) @CgarDan
19) @Eqwhipped https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tLabels=9405811206213090121014


We have space for 1 more
 
Last edited:
Top