I think Shooter is basically on target although that document is a helluva read for the layman. ....
....Also, it may be interesting to note that different grades of amorphous silica gel can be taliored to be more effective in certain RH ranges. What this means is that although commercial humidity control beads may be of the same chemical makeup as crystal kitty litter, their respective capabilities and capacities to buffer humidity swings in the 60-70% RH range may be quite different.
Wilkey
Yes, the only difference between KLH and 'Museum Grade" beads are the size of the nanopores within the beads. Which means one will hold an infinitesimally greater or smaller amount of moisture.
The salient point that Wilkey and shooter make though, is that your beads have become reconditioned to its current set point. To recondition them back to 65%, make sure you Hygrometer is calibrated and you have no leaks, then try putting a bowl of PG solution in your humi. The PG will want to drive your RH to 70% so monitor the rise in RH closely.
Once it reaches 65% replace the PG solution with distilled water. Continue to monitor for any significant change in RH. If it begins to fall, place the PG solution back in to bring it back to 65%. This should reset your beads to a set point of 65% in a few days.
I believe that would be the
wrong thing to do. If you have a dish of water in a closed container, it will lead to a 100% RH or fully saturated condition. By definition, pure water will lead to this. Adding propylene glycol to water in a 50/50 solution will
lower the saturation point to 70%. Pure water alone, 100%.
This is why when your silica is on the dry side, the placement of a small container of water is so effective in raising the ambient humidity. The dish will just pump out water and keep on pumping until you take it out of the humi.
And to reiterate, re-conditioning to a different setpoint is possible. In fact I'd hazard to guess this is the process behind the initial preparation of the commercial humidity buffering crystals.
In this universe, 50/50 PG water will always seek to control at 70% through unalterable thermodynamic process. It is impossible for this to be otherwise. Silica, however, works best as a humidity
buffer when the environment it is in is already quite close to its initial conditioned moisture content. In other words, putting 65% beads in an airtight container that is already essentially at 65% RH will appear to magically regulate the humidity to 65%. Open the container a few times a day, put in some dry smokes, put in some wet smokes, leave it cracked open a bit, etc. and all these actions will lead to the necessity of either spritzing the beads (if RH is trending down) or leaving it open (if RH is trending up and external RH is lower than the internal RH).
It's not magic, but generally, it is convenient. BUT, like any other engineering solution, it is not appropriate or optimal across all conditions of use. Furthermore, I believe there is some confusion as far as the terminology we use. The Oasis XL is an
active RH control device. PG/water is a
passive RH control device. Silica gel is a
passive RH buffering device. These are not the same things although in practice, they generally end up having the same visible effect which is keeping the RH about where we want it while minimizing fluctuations due to input/output considerations.
Wilkey